
*this photo of the north fork of the trask river drainage in summer 2008 courtesy of the Cap’n.
Please note: This is a copy of an email i received from the Wild Salmon Center’s Bob Van Dyk recapping yesterday’s meeting in Salem. Many of us attended this meeting, taking a day off work in a tough economic climate and trading a day’s wages to stand together for what’s scientifically right in our State Forests. for that kind of commitment, i graciously thank each of you. To be clear, we weren’t asking for an end to timber harvest. All we wanted was a peer review of any policy changes. The vigil must be maintained if we want to pass on the magic of North Oregon coastal salmon, steelhead and trout fishing onto the next generations.
also, I know for most Buster readers this won’t make a lot of sense, but i wanted to put it out there for those of you who’ve been following the Board decision, as it relates directly to the watersheds—The Wilson, Trask, Kilchis, Miami and Nehalem—many of us hold dear.
among so many more things, i credit these watersheds and their anglers, in part, for forcing forward much-needed advancements and innovation in modern two-handed tackle design. that said, i’d sure be nice for a little more fly fishing industry support here. Yesterday, only one fishing company showed up. Big props to Zach and Chris from Idylwilde Flies.
Bob’s email:
The end of consensus decision making has clarified the strong timber bias on the Oregon Board of Forestry.
OPB Reporter Ethan Lindsay had it right at the April meeting, when he wrote that Split Votes At State Forestry Board Could Mean More Logging.
Yesterday, five of the six members present favored changing the current plan to put a much stronger emphasis on logging. The board also voted against any sort of outside scientific review before making the changes.
Particularly disappointing was Cal Mukumoto, who last November gave strong support for an outside scientific review. In yesterday’s meeting, Mukumoto said he was concerned that the State Forester’s recommendation lacked the scientific review that he and the board had requested last November, when ODF discovered they had been overcutting by 35% over the level sustainable under the current plan. After Mukumoto raised the issue of the scientific review yesterday, board member Peter Hayes made a formal motion to do the scientific review before increasing the amount of the forest open to clear cutting from 50% of the forest to 70% of the forest. Mukumoto didn’t support Hayes, and likely Hayes ally Bill Hutchison had to miss the meeting. So the board rolled over Hayes and moved on to approve the logging increases, with Mukumoto joining Blackwell and the other board members who only pay lip service to values other than logging. It is increasingly clear that board members like mill-owner Phillippi and big timber-owner Giustina basically see this as a continuation of the fight over federal lands. They seem angry that they lost on federal lands, so they are trying to make the state lands look more like the private lands, which is the official position of the Oregon Forest Industries Council. Union woodworker Steve Wilson said he wanted more jobs.
Board member Hayes is turning out to be a real champion for thoughtful and long-range stewardship of natural resources. If you know him or see him, thank him.
Beyond yesterday’s move for more logging, the board decided to re-open the entire Greatest Permanent Value (GPV) rule, which guides state forest management — including the goals, required processes, etc. With five of the seven votes solid for the timber industry, reopening GPV won’t be pretty. The board set next April as the key date to have materials for this GPV rule change back to them, and they will discuss those changes this September.
The good news is that former Governor Kitzhaber wrote a strong letter to the board in support of scientific review and against the kind of proposal the Board affirmed yesterday. It didn’t make any difference, but given the strong signs that Kitzhaber might run for Governor, things could change for the better come November of next year.
In addition, the terms of board members Giustina and Hutchison expire in less than a year, so there will be a chance to improve the board with their replacements.
In some ways, we are back to the 1980s, when a serious flap over timber domination of the board led to the current statutes on board membership and the norm of the board operating on consensus. It was consensus that led to the current forest plan, with its mix of thinning and clear cuts. With consensus gone, and a board chair who thinks the private forest practices act is a good model for state land, we’re right back to a majority-rule system without a balanced board membership.
Of course, much of the responsibility for the steady march toward timber primacy on the board lies at Governor Kulongoski’s feet. He didn’t oppose a ridiculous bill that was used to threaten the board this session. He left the board without a chair for a year. He refused to even meet with a dozen conservation groups who wrote him to request a meeting to discuss forest policy. He hasn’t even had a staffer who covers state forests. His natural resource advisor, Mike Carrier, supported the end of consensus. Kulongoski isn’t interested, doesn’t care, and has basically let timber have its way on the board. Kulongoski is leaving behind a mess on this one.
Thanks to all who showed up yesterday — there were over 60 folks for fish, hiking, biking, biodiversity, and just plain balance. Lots of clapping for terrific testimony. A dozen drift boats. Signs. Banners. Big blown-up pictures. A lunch BBQ. Fishing guide Jeff Hickman really came through. So in some ways it was the best board meeting I have been to in 10 years. There was so much great testimony and positive energy! Lots of new people, too. Sadly, the outcome seemed pre-ordained, despite literally dozens of people speaking and thousands of emails of support for keeping a balanced approach.
But I’m confident we are on the right side of history on this thing. The big three counties of Multnomah, Washington, and Clackamas are now 1.6 million people. Tillamook County is 25,000 people. For the last 30 years, Tillamook County has grown by 142 people a year on average. The big three counties have grown by 20,000 a year. It is time for this sleeping giant that favors a reasonable balance to awaken. We can do it, folks. Blackwell and his old-school timber allies are leading a parade with their eyes fixed on a rear-view mirror. Their clumsy timber grab for the rich and diverse public resources in the Tillamook is at odds with the long-term public interest.
I’ll get a more complete account up on my webpage soon. www.thetillamook.net
Bob Van Dyk